| The parking lot of the Wellfleet Town Beach. |
| This is how to travel to the beach |
| The dune outside the Beachcomber |
| Crabs at the Audubon Wildlife Sanctuary |
"Execution is about running a tight ship ... but where is the ship going? Some companies, if they think they can execute very well, then they can always say 'well, we'll just follow another ship'. But sometimes that ships starts to fly, and then you are in trouble. I think Apple is good at both. At the following, and they only fold things in when they are ready. And then sometimes they just completely say that being on a ship is the wrong thing altogether, and say 'let's make an airplane'.If you want, you can download the podcast here.
This Spring, my roommates hosted their annual work party at our apartment. It started out good with a make-your-own fajita station, then lulled out, but then everyone was surprised when it turned into a surprise beer tasting party.
We sampled 13 excellent beers in addition to a special appearance of Benlap IPA, which set the baseline for the scoring of the beer tasting.
This was the Beer rating system:
A - Annie would drink this, while pregnant, in Germany, in 1910, if she was there.
B - Tad would drink this, with work to do.
C - Coifable (Quaffable?)
D - Duncan pre game
F - Fit for Yale (My roommates went to Harvard)
In the end, Stone Brewing Company's Double Arrogant Bastard won with a B rating.
I recently read a short article in the Boston Globe that referenced a study by the Virginia Quarterly Review on the true cost of reading an e-book. One of the paragraphs reads:
In fact, the human and environmental impact of mining for electronics is huge. The pace of innovation in electronics is so fast, with many devices getting replaced after only two years of use, that electronic reading is actually far more costly, in energy terms, than paper reading. If you take all of the resources that go into making iPad-like devices and gather them up, "the nearly ten million e-readers expected to be in use by next year would have to supplant the sales of 250 million new books" each year for the transition between paper and paperless to come out even. Reading a book on an iPad uses almost 50 times as much energy as reading one by electric light.
So, from their math (250M / 10M = 25), if each e-reader is used to purchase 25 books, then paper and electronic-paper will come out even? That sounds easy to do, and it doesn't even take into account e-magazines and e-newspapers. Also, I want to see the math behind their claim in the last sentence.